Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience Former foreign minister Khurshid Mahmud Kasuri has revealed that India planned to launch air strikes on Pakistani soil following the Mumbai attacks in order to target the banned militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba LeT and Jamaatud Dawa JuDIndia Today reported. Supposing there is limited strike on Muridke, the headquarters of JuD. The former foreign minister states that he told McCain that Pakistan Army would give a "measured" response in case of a strike inside its territory. We looked at the interest of Kashmiris, Kashmiris wanted demilitarisation," Kasuri said during the interview. He claimed that the Sir Creek agreement was decided and only needed to be signed. India must have got the message from USA not to attack, otherwise retaliation would be equal as received. Dear Indian brothers and sisters, Pakistan is not Burma or Nepal who totally rely on India and stuff made by India for them. Pakistan got an Army and even a limited strike from Indian Army will open a door of no return for both nations. So better stay inside your Border and respect the sovereignty of independent nation. I am sure India will not dare to do it even if USA and West backs and encourage India to launch air strikes in Pakistan territory. Because they know the time has changed and we are nuclear power now. India can never even do it. Some sensational news is required for promoting the book. So, wait for a proper opportunity to connect back. Indians knew it then, know it now and also know it for future that any limited, short or long strike inside Pakistan will receive a very nasty reply from the Pakistan army which will escalate into a full blown war which neither country can afford. Radha krishna now or ever if someone try to be adventurous the answer from Pak Army will bebefitted and with full force. Manmohan was a weak and an old man. While the PM himself has no say in the congress party. UPA was a total disaster. India therefore, was left to bleed. Every single organization and individual involved had been banned by UN, David Headly revealed every thing in front of FBI. Look at what decades of US military strikes have achievednothing, in fact situation is more worse than ever ,only waste of money and innocent lives, terrorists cannot be decimated by air strikes alone, it needs long term planning and ground realities have to be understood and resolvedlike Kashmir issue for India and population,poverty,education,health and others for Pakistan. War is not the answer, both countries would suffer immensely, there may be issue and disagreements, which can all be resolved with sound mind, and realistic discussions. I believe the fear of war prevents the war from starting, although one side can start the war unilaterally however it takes both sides to end it, so any decision to strike would quickly flare into a full fletch war. What India does not realise is that Pakistan is not going to take any attack on its territory lightly, and though I agree India is economically and militarily very strong but by attacking Pakistan they are brining the fight home. I think it is in the interest of both countries to sit down and sort out their differences through negotiation rather than upping Cowboys antics. It would be very irrational for India to indulge in such a folly considering its desire to be seen as a stable and peaceful place for international investments. India lacks the power to overwhelm Pakistan and will face certain retaliation. International investors will be reluctant to expand their businesses in a country that is good at provoking a conflict but unable to stop retaliatory measures. We are digging the hole we are in and are going down and down on our own. This is the sad reality. We are not Syria or Burma or Iraq. Not only after Mumbai attacks,, India on many occasions want to attack on Pakistan Dialogue only option for both countries Manmohan Singh Government just planned, never executed the plans. India does not have to do anything. India strategy is just wait and watch. As other countries are moving their money out of Pakistan where only China is investing Pakistan is moving in Complete isolation. If we are not progressing we will not let India progress by propagating Kashmir issue internationally but this strategy is becoming Complete failure and will be continue to do so. One section wants peace with India but other section does not want peace. If Pakistan is in two minds then how peace talks will be successful? Good thing India never did. It would have been sorry state of affairs. Then who will control non-state actors. You can ride on non-state actors long time, we both tasting the such rides. India can never launch air strikes in Pakistan. They know the response from Pakistan would be massive. Again and again we see and read about the limitations of Indian "power" which ends at Wagah border. A future UNSC seat holder must not only represent a region of countries which India do not and must be able to transform the region to her economic, military or diplomatic might - something India do not have the capability to do. This is the price they will pay for the never ending Kashmir dispute. Kasuri picked the right time and write words to market his book in India. Indian folks are dreaming of such thing these days. Dipak - What "success in isolating country"? The world acknowledges our sacrifices in fighting terror. Whereas, this Indian government is working hard in making the world realise about its communal disintegration work - forex damaging than our dossiers! Had we not looked after Kashmirs interests then we could have just made LOC international border and had Indians do their thing in Kashmir. Instead we are holding our ground, even losing money from cross border trade. Atleast show some considerations! Pakistani response would not have been equal. Otherwise Bharatis would have done it. It is the unequal response which has kept it in its place. Shot down within seconds so no this would not be so simple. If I wrote a book and if I consider myself a person of huge reputation and clout regionally I would need to make some statements promoting my writings. Otherwise politically the right time for such disclosure was when Indian minister and security advisor made statements about surgical strikes and cold start doctrine, about 2 months back I think. These ministers have no conscience. They go with the flow, simple now he wanted to sell more copies of his book A full exercise in marketing of the book. Manmohan Singh was an extremely weak PM with a great deal of affection for all things Pakistan. It was not surprising because he was born in Pakistan. InIndian papers were full of articles demanding why India was not carrying out surgical strikes but Dr Singh clearly vetoed the options. The stories about the settlement remain in the imagination of persons who are no longer in power. The so called understandings were nothing but a Pakistani proposal which called for an abject surrender on the Indian side. No Indian government, how so ever well disposed they may have been to Pakistan, could have accepted the proposals. So, the book is not credible. Just selling his book. Kasuri was a part of a dictator Gen. Musharraf who destroyed the peace and prosperity in Pakistan by joining the western war on terror. Musharraf kept his interest over national interest. Asif As long as there is acknowledgement that India is only countering as in reacting to a provocationit is OK. He is just trying to make money as no one would even bother to negate him. Whatever he says is history and everyone knows it. Do not create angers among Indo-Pak citizens. India in one side making huge effort of industrial revolution and on other side Pak just seeing Chinese support. Stop Chinese in your land. We will get a UN security council seat. I think every option must been on table and weighed upon by its pros and cons. Then the wise decision must came out, which is to isolate pakistan and not to talk with pakistan until mumbai culprits brought to justice Luck favoured them into deciding to cancel the idea pitbull they would have got the bitter most taste of life, a real nightmare. There is a 50 year gap in the two. Secondly give me one good reason why the current P5 would like to change the makeup of the UNSC? You do know that all P5 members must vote in favour of any change and none of them are willing to cast a vote. He was the best foreign minister of Pakistan. But then Mumbai attack derailed everything. If political will is there all the issues can be sorted. Surgical strikes, really did they think that they were attacking Somalia, radars are not sleeping I hope they know that. There are several ways to respond to an external threat which the Mumbai attacks were. Of course one of the way was to have surgical strikes. But there are other ways too. The way which India took was extremely intelligent one. Most of the Indian plans stayed as plan and never get executed because they know the strength of Pakistani Forces. Is there any country in the world that has broken its diplomatic relations with Pakistan in the wake of Mumbai attacks? As far as I know even India has not done this so far. I am sure his book will make millions in India now. He will buy houses in Dubai and London and live happily ever after. Jan It is the utmost responsibility of any country to protect the lives of its citizens; it depends who the other side is. Pakistan let go from drone attacks to abbotabad, because otherside was too powerful. Any future war with India will carry terrible cost in terms of human lives for both sides, just the size of India in every respect tells who the winner would be. India is interfering in the affairs of all its neighbours, latest victim is Nepal. Afghanistan became deathbed for Russian Army, and the cause of fall of Russian Empire!!! Riz Pakistan will benifit a lot. I salute your Army and respect you as a Pakistani AND I expect the same from you. Partition has resulted in many issues and only development on both sides will make us resolve such issues. As far as Kashmir is concernedparadise has been turned into a Hell Hole. Pakistan is not a benefactor of Kashmiris but is looking at its strategic interest "WATER". Khwarezmi i think your thinking capability is limited to kasmir. Ok we are nothing in front of you ,then what stops you from taking kashmir? Rashid Ishaq : do you think Pakistan would do whatever want to do because it has nuclear weapons? There are limits for everything. Gurpreet Singh Sabharwal USA It will take India around 10 years to get to UNSC at 7 to 8 percent potential annual growth rate, which looks unfeasible at this point of time, Keeping in view the internal quarrels over economic reforms, disturbance in various provinces and the volume of debts. Germany, Brazil and Japan are more promising contester in this game. Author of any book will go to any length to promote his book, Kasuri is no different. Your views will only remain your views, keeping you happy in the mean time before the actual results. Countries that relentlessly work towards a goal never fail, and India just appears to be doing that. Pakistan was already a nuclear power in and things could have exploded irreversibly. Even today as a Pakistani, I would like India and Pakistan to join heads and hands rather than engaging horns to jointly tackle terror. Even if Hafiz Saeed or Lakhvi were involved inthey are very much there to be properly prosecuted with joint efforts under at-ease environments. I think Nuclear threat is not valid in such limited escalations. However our conventional capability of surgical response is far better than India. East Indian great idea. India, US, Israel are pioneers and experts in these kind of operations. Check this out, the DAWN report. Angry Pitbull I have never seen any anti indian propaganda before elections in Pakistan. Not even religious parties do that. Its on your end where every political party starts its campaign with Pakistan. Read some independent, neutral reports and read S. M Mushrif book titled "who killed Karkare, the real face of terrorism in India". At least read the synopsis through Google search. Zack-Pakistani Mr Zack, please do not get Paranoid as India has no plans to attack Pakistan. NAMO has single minded goal and that is to grow India as fast as possible and develop India. The Indian PM is working very very hard in persuit of that single goal. Just focus on your internal growth of Pakistan. Cheers Rajeev Velagapudi All that may be true, but what a foolish thought. A war between India and Pakistan means that both the countries would go back hundreds of years and how many people will die. Uday Kulkarni :: If only more and more people in Pakistan knew this, they would begin to trust India. Their perception of PM Modi is entirely wrong. PM Modi would be very happy to see Pakistan working very closely with India on the economic front. Sheraz Indian politics is much more mature to be guided by mere emotions. India is more concerned about development and economy Kashmir is just one irritant in relations with Pakistan, this issue is not even of much importance in local politics. Pakistan should also consider concentrating on development and security of country and its people. Kashmiris are peaceful and just want foreign indian invaders to leave their country. Pakistan forex not Iraq, Afghanistan or Syria - I am sure India was not serious. Javed Iqbal : Frankly, I have no idea how long it will take for India to get the UNSC seat. Gurpreet Singh Sabharwal USA in debt department, india is the second most indebted country in the world after Greece. Angry Pitbull, elections will be innot that close. Our politicians never use India card, they use other tactics to win elections. If India strikes, Pakistan reserves the right to retaliate in shape of nuclear attack or conventional. Gurpreet Singh Sabharwal USA How can you compare a poverty-stricken country like India with wealth-laden countries like Japan and Germany? What would you say about kids sitting in front of Restaurants to pounce on the left over food by customers? India is also finding ways to get the Iranian debt rescheduled. These are in no way the indicators of a prosperous economy. Go to war or pay debt??? Rajeev Velagapudi if Pakistan had so many people too then Pakistan would be all that too if not better. And that goes for any country with more then a billion people. You really havent achieved anything. They can have planned whatever they want. They lack the guts to try any of it though, knowing full well what the consequences would be. If India had mistakenly dared to undertake surgical strikes in Pakistan, the measured action by Pakistan would have been out of proportion inflicting heavy damages to India beyond its the imagination. Never underestimate Pakistan, and its wish to live in peaceful coexistence with its neighbors, if compelled, Pakistan will fight back fiercely and revengefully to teach a lesson to India of its defeat in Think thousand times before striking Pakistan. God forbid if this happens both the country would return to Stone Age. India will have more to lose than Pakistan. Kashmir is the key to changing things over night. After that not a single blast will take place in either country. He is ahead of them in this game, and India will find it, if it tries to be adventurous. By looking at comments made each Pakistanis, they are proud of nuclear weapons, which they will never able to use. Butthe whole point here is about the Pakistan army which the people here are boasting about. It is the real evil cause for the Pakistan failed economy. If the army was equal to what the people are thumping about it. How did USA manage to strike air drone attacks? You have already lost it, how much compromise can you and your thumping army make on other country striking on your territory. So the lion power is only against India not on global front. Stop thinking about India or any other country as a matter of fact to be your core breathing central agenda. It must be replaced with more sensible issues with the former being 2nd ,3rd priority on the list. So what if Pakistan or India are nuclear. Russia is nuclear and see what happened to this country. I remember very well read in Times of India that the Mumbai attacks were planned by India itself. This was disclosed by an Indian intelligence officer who was investigating on the Nov. Fine but what happened ultimately with both countries. We need peace in subcontinent and good trade and cultural relations. Moid You were nuclear state during Kargil too. Remember 4th July Visit of NS to US? So despite having them it is hard to use them and I say this because Pakistan tried using them twice already and was stopped in tracks by US. The day you go ahead and use it, India might suffer a little but the if would be very bad for Pakistan, not because India needs to retaliate but because you would be an isolated country with all possible economic sanctions on you just like Iran had it on them or Russia. It brought them to their Knees in few years. Today Iran wants to sign a nuclear deal so that those sanctions can be lifted and Russia is talking to US again to lift the economic sanctions. Yes both countries need to refrain form going into war. I know political leaderships of both countries are trying. Javed Iqbal Economic well being has little to do with UNSC seat. When China became the UNSC permanent member they were not rich. That is the reason both countries cannot effort to go to war. Singh: Were you in any planning meeting on the either side. If so write a book, will be best seller in India and Pakistan. Both country men love and live with such gossips. Or may be, he NOT had any credit with GHQ. So India decided to attack. Surprisingly and unexpectedly Pakistan said it would retaliate if attacked. Given this hitherto unpredicted response, India shelved this plan. Many of my friends are saying it is a stunt to sell his book by Kusari. I assure you that was the case, not one but two surgical attacks were planned. If you publish my comments, i want to learn any denial from Indian top Miltary brass. Of course, within 10 minutes Indian would have flown back. It is more telling than a News. Is Indian side can blind fold Pakistan redar system. These Mullah have advisor right to attack a sovereign nation. What they have achieved? Let assume there is war? Indian foreign affairs a mess with issues and interference with Nepal, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, China etc. They need to have people in foreign affairs with understanding of these countries than relying on intelligence. Any aggressive act by India will result in nuclear holocaust. Probably India want escalation of tension to keep their military up-to-date, otherwise they cannot justify billion just on aircrafts which are falling down from sky on daily basis. German chancellor is in India, probably Modi need to order some 50 billion Dollar worth pitbull German hardware. Better advice will be to order just one billion dollar worth of German toilets, shoes for children, machines to clear Indian rivers rom dead bodies and pollution etc. Pakistan is busy in making short -long range nuclear incinerators. Sheraz What kind of Sovereignty you are taking about where US willing did drone strikes on your terrorists including innocent citizens! This could be true. That time was very bad for Pakistan which was bewildered by the presence of NATO forces in Afghanistan. Pakistan always suspected US behind the Indian hostility towards Pakistan. By the time the Indian Army could mobilize, international pressure had been brought to bear on the Government of India to let advisor slide. Unlike Pakistan, the Army cannot ignore the PM, so a far greater war was averted. This is the common theme with India. Can you imagine how much restraint it took to not shell Pakistani positions during the Kargil war even when two airplanes were shot down by Pakistan? India does a cost-benefit analysis before starting anything. I have seen videos of his interview about this several months ago. Riaz Murtaza and he is the source of all truth so everyone else must be lying. Odds are the weapon would either be intercepted and worse it could even explode within its borders. The nuclear myth is a big bust and you will see that there is no security to hide behind it. If it explodes you lose if it does not explode you lose so no one plays to lose. Time is running, why should you sacrifice your future. India keeps planning such activities-but they dont have the guts to carry out anything except target border villages or in historical perspective-clumsily react to our adventures! They should have done that to bring people back to their senses. Harboring such groups in Pakistan is irresponsible. Now economic stability and well-being are prerequisite for a country to be taken into consideration for UNSC. When a man has wealth and power, he most likely wishes to be in the limelight. Pakistani power elite have the same ego problem, they want and do get attention from the media. There is nothing really more to this. The only threat the India has Nuclear Arsenal Pakistan have otherwise it may attack during Zia rein and many other time even some months before during kashmir cross fire he tested as he did during for separating Kashmir, But could not do as the counter devastation was so huge that he could not sustain the injuries of war Moid Nuclear power or not. Pakistan is well on its way to self destruction. The rest of the world does not need to lift a finger. Just wait and watch. That is good enough. I do not think India would prefer this option. Indians prefer devious methods so what we can expect from Indians is their support of terrorists and separatists inside Pakistan. Rajeev Velagapudi: Wars are not stopped. They are responded to. I keep saying this repeatedly: given the very nature of emotions and sensibilities between the Pak India non relationship, the spectre of a nuclear war is a real one, in the event either party starts a war. This is especially true in the case if India attacks Pakistan, given that Pakistan cannot reach very far into India with its conventional warfare. With more than warheads ready to be fired at each other in the SubContinent, the loss borne by the two nations would be immeasurable and, in my opinion, unfixable. The loss of some of the largest cities and most fertile lands will create a disaster that the world has yet not seen. Those at the helm of affairs, on both sides, absolutely understand this. Hence, the presence of the nuclear weapons are themselves the best reasons to stay away from military adventurism. The masses, on the other hand, can be manipulated to maintain an environment of aggression. India and Pakistan both benefitted in there being a moderate nonvindictive Pakistan-born gentleman PM in India Dr Manmohan Singh in Current Indian PM Mr Narendra Modi is an ex-preacher of RSS. He is not like Dr Singh at all. No one in India wants a war with Pakistan, or any other country. Suppose for a moment, that someone in Pakistan launches nuclear attack on 50 cities in India, there is no doubt that India will repond in at least 25 cities in Pakistan. It would end civilisation n the subcontinent, Rashid IshaqNuclear bombs are not saving Pakistan from self-destruction path. Let us talk in 10 years time, compare and contrast two countries. He asked the delegation to ask Pentagon to communicate with the Pakistan Army directly. If India would have decided, they would have. That was never the plan Recommend Pakistani Oct 06, pm India must have got the message from USA not to attack, otherwise retaliation would be equal as received Recommend Sheraz Oct 06, pm Dear Indian brothers and sisters, Pakistan is not Burma or Nepal who totally rely on India and stuff made by India for them. India can never even do it Recommend Murthy Oct 06, pm Some sensational news is required for promoting the book. So, wait for a proper opportunity to connect back Recommend lafanga Oct 06, pm Indians knew it then, know it now and also know it for future that any limited, short or long strike inside Pakistan will receive a very nasty reply from the Pakistan army which will escalate into a full blown war which neither country can afford Kasuri is out selling his book in India so he wants to create the hype Recommend zubair Oct 06, pm Radha krishna now or ever if someone try to be adventurous the answer from Pak Army will bebefitted and with full force Recommend Befree Oct 06, pm Manmohan was a weak and an old man. We looked at the interest of Kashmiris, Kashmiris wanted demilitarisation," Kasuri said during the interview Pakistan is looking at its own interests and does not care a dime about Kashmiris, Recommend Umar Oct 06, pm I believe the fear of war prevents the war from starting, although one side can start the war unilaterally however it takes both sides to end it, so any decision to strike would quickly flare into a full fletch war. Jan Oct 06, pm It would be very irrational for India to indulge in such a folly considering its desire to be seen as a stable and peaceful place for international investments. International investors will be reluctant to expand their businesses in a country that is good at provoking a conflict but unable to stop retaliatory measures Recommend Jeevan Oct 06, pm Recommend Sabi Oct 06, pm We are digging the hole we are in and are going down and down on our own. We are not Syria or Burma or Iraq Recommend anonymous Oct 06, pm Not only after Mumbai attacks,, India on many occasions want to attack on Pakistan Dialogue only option for both countries Recommend AZ Oct 06, pm Sheraz - Well said, They only want to see the one side of the picture, someone should made them realize their terror activity in Pakistan Recommend Rajeev Velagapudi Oct 06, pm Who can stop India if it wants to go ahead? Siddique Oct 06, pm Good thing India never did. You can ride on non-state actors long time, we both tasting the such rides Consesness Recommend Khwarezmi Oct 06, pm India can never launch air strikes in Pakistan. This is the price they will pay for the never ending Kashmir dispute Recommend Lala Oct 06, pm Kasuri picked the right time and write words to market his book in India. Indian folks are dreaming of forex thing these days Recommend sohail khan Oct 06, pm Mr. Kasuri is trying to add salt and pepper to promote the sale of his book Recommend citizen Oct 06, pm Its war alreadybut on economic front. Recommend Khwarezmi Oct 06, pm ilyas kashmiri We are ooking after our own interest INCLUDING Kashmirs. Recommend zahid Oct 06, pm Recommend Pakistan Oct 06, pm Pakistani response would not have been equal. Shot down within seconds so no this would not be so simple Recommend Arvind Ajimal Oct 06, pm If I wrote a book and if I consider myself a person of huge reputation and clout regionally I would need to make some statements promoting my writings. Otherwise politically the right time for such disclosure was when Indian minister and security advisor made statements about surgical strikes and cold start doctrine, about 2 months back I think Recommend Saad Oct 06, pm These ministers have no conscience. So, the book is not credible Recommend wshaikh Oct 06, pm Just selling his book. Whatever he says is history and everyone knows it Recommend Raju Oct 06, pm Do not create angers among Indo-Pak citizens. Get a hint Recommend Inditramp Oct 06, pm He was the best foreign minister of Pakistan. If political will is there all the issues can be sorted Recommend Gurpreet Singh Sabharwal USA Oct 06, pm lafanga : You are misinformed. As far as I know even India has not done this so far Recommend SPICY KASURI METHI Oct 06, pm I am sure his book will make millions in India now. He will buy houses in Dubai and London pitbull live happily ever after Recommend Syed Ali Oct 06, pm M. Recommend Jatinder Oct 06, pm Riz Pakistan will benifit a lot. Pakistan is not a benefactor of Kashmiris but is looking at its strategic interest "WATER" Recommend Kamlesh Oct 06, pm Khwarezmi i think your thinking capability is limited to kasmir. Recommend Indian Oct 06, pm Rashid Ishaq : do you think Pakistan would do whatever want to do because advisor has nuclear weapons? There are limits for everything Recommend prateek Oct 06, pm Looks like Kasuri released the book in India for commercial reasons Recommend Javed Iqbal Oct 06, pm Gurpreet Singh Sabharwal USA It will take India around 10 years to get to UNSC at 7 to 8 percent potential annual growth rate, which looks unfeasible at this point of time, Keeping in view the internal quarrels over economic reforms, disturbance in various provinces and the volume of debts. Germany, Brazil and Japan are more promising contester in this game Recommend AKNasser Oct 06, pm Author of any book will go to any length to promote his book, Kasuri is no different. At least read the synopsis through Google search Recommend Ish Oct 06, pm Singh What was it that held you back from carrying out your so called surgical strike? Cheers Recommend Ashfaq Ahmed Oct 06, pm Rajeev Velagapudi All that may be true, but what a foolish thought. A war between India and Pakistan means that both the countries would go back hundreds of years and how many people will die Recommend anonymous Oct 06, pm Uday Kulkarni :: If only more and more people in Pakistan knew this, they would begin to trust India. PM Modi would be very happy to see Pakistan working very closely with India on the economic front Recommend khalid Oct 06, pm india and Pakistan must make peacegood for both, mutual destruction is not a good idea Recommend Ravi Vancouver Oct 06, pm Sheraz Indian politics is much more mature to be guided by mere emotions. Pakistan should also consider concentrating on development and security of country and its people Recommend Ajay Oct 06, pm Recommend Zak Oct 06, pm tamil then you are an insecure nation held togather by force. Kashmiris are peaceful and just want foreign indian invaders to leave their country Recommend independentthinker Oct 06, pm Pakistan is not Iraq, Afghanistan or Syria - I am sure India was not serious. Recommend Gurpreet Singh Sabharwal USA Oct 06, pm Javed Iqbal : Frankly, I have no idea how long it will take for India to get the UNSC seat. End of story Recommend Zak Oct 06, pm Gurpreet Singh Sabharwal USA in debt department, india is the second most indebted country in the world after Greece. Our politicians never use India card, they use other tactics to win elections Recommend John, USA Oct 06, pm If India strikes, Pakistan reserves the right to retaliate in shape of nuclear attack or conventional Recommend Javed Iqbal Oct 06, pm Gurpreet Singh Sabharwal USA How can you compare a poverty-stricken country like India with wealth-laden countries like Japan and Germany? Recommend Hamza Oct 06, pm Rajeev Velagapudi if Pakistan had so many people too then Pakistan would be all that too if not better. You really havent achieved anything Recommend Sonny Afridi Oct 06, pm They can have planned whatever they want. They lack the guts to try any of it though, knowing full well what the consequences would be Recommend Sonny Afridi Oct 06, pm Recommend Jalbani Baloch Oct 06, pm If India had mistakenly dared to undertake surgical strikes in Pakistan, the measured action by Pakistan would have been out of proportion inflicting heavy damages to India beyond its the imagination. It must be replaced with more sensible issues with the former being 2nd ,3rd priority on the list Recommend pk Oct 07, am Moid So what if Pakistan or India are nuclear. That is the reason both countries cannot effort to go to war Recommend aga khan Oct 07, am Singh: Were you in any planning meeting on the either side. Both country men love and live with such gossips Recommend aga khan Oct 07, am original realist; This sentence alone tell that he is "fabricating" the story to sell his book. Or may be, he NOT had any credit with GHQ Recommend rarun Oct 07, am So India decided to attack. Recommend Azhar Oct 07, am Many of my friends are saying it is a stunt to sell his book by Kusari. Very likly Recommend Azhar Oct 07, am goodDeedsLeadToPakistan will be isolated if we could not put our house in order. Recommend Baloch Oct 07, am Indian foreign affairs a mess with issues and interference with Nepal, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, China etc. Recommend Aussie Oct 07, am Recommend Dervaish Oct 07, am This could be true. Pakistan always suspected US behind the Indian hostility towards Pakistan Recommend Rish Oct 07, am Aussie "then why india didnt attack? Unlike Pakistan, the Army cannot ignore the PM, so a far greater war was averted This is the common theme with India. It thinks long-term Can you imagine how much restraint it took to not shell Pakistani positions during the Kargil war even when two airplanes were shot down by Pakistan? I have seen videos of his interview about this several months ago Recommend Kalashnikov Oct 07, am Riaz Murtaza and he is the source of all truth so everyone else must be lying. Recommend Hameed Oct 07, am They should have done that to bring people back to their senses. Now economic stability and well-being are prerequisite for a country to be taken into consideration for UNSC Recommend Burjor Oct 07, am When a man has wealth and power, he most likely wishes to be in the limelight. That is good enough Recommend rehan Oct 07, pm I do not think India would prefer this option. Indians prefer devious methods so what we can expect from Indians is their support of terrorists and separatists inside Pakistan Recommend Azmat Ali Oct 07, pm Rajeev Velagapudi: Wars are not stopped. The masses, on the other hand, can be manipulated to maintain an environment of aggression Recommend Observer Oct 08, am India and Pakistan both benefitted in there being a moderate nonvindictive Pakistan-born gentleman PM in India Dr Manmohan Singh in Current Indian PM Mr Narendra Modi is an ex-preacher of RSS. It would end civilisation n the subcontinent, Recommend Munir Oct 08, am Rashid IshaqNuclear bombs are not saving Pakistan from self-destruction path. No war but peace in subcontinent. Pray this happens Recommend Dude Oct 09, am Kasuri is in market to sell his book. What is better story than war between India-Pakistan?
forex live trading - free EA Profit V10 robot 2016
forex live trading - free EA Profit V10 robot 2016
However, watching TV can benefits children if they make good use of it.
That revival is considered to be a harbinger of the Great Awakening, which began in earnest a few years later.